Blackwood family gold watch and chain
We Have Always Lived in the CastleThe Blackwood family gold watch and chain are inherited possessions that become a measure of who may claim the family home and its past. First kept among Mary Katherine Blackwood’s father’s belongings, they are treated by Mary Katherine as objects with histories and vulnerabilities, while Charles Blackwood regards the chain as valuable property. Their altered states—a watch stopped after Charles starts it and a chain removed from its box, nailed to a tree, and later found damaged—make a private struggle over the house visible in material form.
Identity and Family History
The watch and chain are stored in a leather jewelry box in a dresser drawer in Mary Katherine Blackwood’s father’s former room, which Charles has taken over. The box also contains cuff links and a signet ring. The watch rests in a small box of its own on satin; at first it is not ticking, and its chain lies curled beside it. These details place the objects within a family inheritance, rather than presenting them as ordinary household tools or ornaments.
Mary Katherine distinguishes among the items according to her own feelings and the family relationships she associates with them. She will not touch her mother’s jewelry, and the signet ring repels her because she associates a closed ring with being tightly bound. The chain, by contrast, appeals to her: it winds around her hand, and she imagines it as having endured a long period shut away in darkness. Her decision to remove it is therefore selective. She takes the chain, but leaves the ring and returns the jewelry box carefully to the drawer.
Removal and Display
Mary Katherine initially intends to bury the chain. She changes her mind, deciding instead that it has earned a place above ground where it can catch the sunlight. She plans to nail it to the tree from which a book had fallen, and takes it to her room while Constance Blackwood makes gingerbread, Julian Blackwood sleeps, and Charles goes in and out of the village stores. She later carries out the plan: the chain is found nailed to a tree.
The change from hidden heirloom to outdoor display reverses the chain’s earlier position in the family room. Mary Katherine removes it from the enclosure of the jewelry box, but does not keep it as a conventional personal possession; she places it where it will be visible. That gesture also makes the chain part of her effort to resist Charles’s occupation of her father’s room and the house. Its changed location gives an inherited object a new role in the conflict without making its ownership straightforward.
Charles’s Claim and the Stopped Watch
Julian recognizes the chain as his brother’s and had believed the brother was buried with it. His surprise makes the object’s uncertain family history explicit: he supposes that the chain had been kept from the father, though the passage does not resolve when or why that happened. Charles, meanwhile, presents the chain as something he might have worn and complains that one link is smashed; he also says it could have been sold. Constance responds that no one wants it, and questions the value Charles assigns to it.
Charles’s handling of the watch produces a parallel conflict. He has started it, so it is ticking when Mary Katherine finds it again on the dresser, alongside the chain, the signet ring, Charles’s tobacco pouch, and his matchbooks. She turns the winding knob backward until the watch makes a small crack and stops. She cannot return it fully to the earlier position because Charles has kept it going for two or three days. For her, however, stopping it is a release from his influence: she believes she has undone one thing he touched and weakened his hold on the room.
That act belongs to a broader, deliberate attempt to make the room unfamiliar to Charles and thereby drive him away. Mary Katherine removes the books and blankets, carries her father’s belongings to the attic, and fills the emptied spaces with wood, leaves, glass, and metal collected from the field and woods. She pours water onto the bed and tears down the curtains. The watch’s stopped movement is one element in this remaking of the room: a familiar family possession is no longer allowed to continue in the state Charles gave it.
Material Memory and the House
The watch and chain belong to a larger pattern in which household objects preserve family history while becoming exposed to conflict over their use and place. Julian’s recollection of the chain, Mary Katherine’s attachment to it, and Charles’s interest in wearing or selling it assign competing meanings to the same heirloom. The object does not settle the family’s claims; its movement between drawer, bedroom, and tree makes those claims tangible and contested.
Other domestic objects in the narrative sharpen this association between possessions and the family’s damaged history. In recalling the poisoning, Julian focuses on the heavy silver sugar bowl and on Constance’s decision to empty and scrub it before the doctor or police arrived; Constance explains that she had seen a spider in it. After the villagers wreck the house, the small rose-patterned sugar bowl is found with its handles gone amid the broken kitchen goods. These are distinct objects and incidents, but together with the watch and chain they show how family possessions carry practical, inherited, and public meanings at once. The gold watch and chain are especially charged because their handling tracks Charles’s attempt to inhabit the father’s room and Mary Katherine’s effort to deny that occupation.
